Quote: Dolly Dagger @ November 9 2009, 2:27 PM GMTThey wouldn't turn her down in real life.
Oh, of course not. A free f**k from a hot chick, I'm not crazy.
Things you like, but know you shouldn't really... Page 13
This thread is locked. No further replies can be posted.
Quote: Dolly Dagger @ November 9 2009, 2:27 PM GMTThey wouldn't turn her down in real life.
Too true Dolly. Back in ye olden days when everyone was getting all political, I had mad arguments with my friends over famous birds you would shag.
They always picked some obsure, unattractive, man faced indie singer instead of the more obvious film / telly / pop stars. They actually intellectualised their potential shag partners and used criteria such as political leanings and intelligence as being primary factors.
Of course, after a few pints, they'd all be lusting after the girl with the shortest skirt and too much make up.
Hypocrites are so like, hypocritical.
How can 'too much' makeup be a good thing?
Surely if it's too much anything, then it's literally too much?
I think women who have some kind of air of mystery or some discernible talent are generally more attractive, aren't they. RC?
RC just needs massive jugs.
Quote: zooo @ November 9 2009, 2:34 PM GMTHow can 'too much' makeup be a good thing?
Surely if it's too much anything, then it's literally too much?
"And an extra point for being so clever!" 
Quote: Dolly Dagger @ November 9 2009, 2:27 PM GMTThey wouldn't turn her down in real life.
I certainly would turn her down!
Ooooooooooooh, love that show.
Quote: Tim Walker @ November 9 2009, 2:35 PM GMTI think women who have some kind of air of mystery or some discernible talent are generally more attractive, aren't they. RC?
Of course they are Tim. But if you went down the pub and said to your mates - 'You know that Megan Fox? Yeah? I wrecked that booty last night.' - you'd be top of the bragging rights brigade.
Quote: Tim Walker @ November 9 2009, 2:35 PM GMTI think women who have some kind of air of mystery or some discernible talent are generally more attractive, aren't they. RC?
No, they just need to giggle occasionally and make men feel better about themselves. Most men don't want women to be smarter, more talented or interesting then them.
Depends what kind of mates you have. 
You are such a massively blokey bloke, RC. It's part of your charm.
Quote: Aaron @ November 9 2009, 2:38 PM GMTI certainly would turn her down!
M'kay.
'You know that Cindy Crawford, right? If she were my wife, I'm tellin' ya, if she were my wife, I'd whack a couple of kids up her, quick smart. And if she gave me any lip, I'd show her the back of my hand. She might be an incredibly rich super model with showbiz friends and a jet set lifestyle, but I'd soon sort her out, cooking, cleaning, the whole f**king lot mate. Besides, I think she'd quite like Dagenham.'
What R.C likes to do, is be 'the voice of truth' and reveal what we're all really thinking. What he doesn't realise is, that I'm actually 'the voice of the truth of the truth'. And in fact what he's saying is a double lie,he says, men don't really want the intellectual f**k, they want the dirty slag. But what I know is they don't really want to want the dirty slag, they want the intellectual f**k. But because The Voice of The Truth and not The Voice of The Truth of The Truth is saying these things, it's hard to argue against it, because people give in to that miss-believe.
Now, I was told by The Voice of The Truth of the Truth of the truth of the truth. That men don't want either slag or intellectual f**ks, they just want f**ks, end of. None of this categorizing bullshit. Or imaginings by 'The Truth' He who seems to have grown on a turd's turd of a turd's turd.
Quote: Dolly Dagger @ November 9 2009, 2:42 PM GMTNo, they just need to giggle occasionally and make men feel better about themselves. Most men don't want women to be smarter, more talented or interesting then them.
That's an incredibly sweeping and rather sexist suggestion, Dolly. 
I'd f**k Fox, but it'd be a grudge f**k. I'd make sure she didn't climax.