Kenneth
Sunday 25th October 2009 1:36pm [Edited]
5,447 posts
Quote: Tim Walker @ October 25 2009, 1:26 AM BST
I've never particularly understood why someone adopting someone else's voices and mannerisms is considered inherently funny. Is there a psychologist, psychiatrist, sociologist or anthropologist in the house to explain this phenomenon?
*waits expectantly*
You'll be waiting a while for them psychologists, psychiatrists, sociologists and anthropologists to show up.
Perhaps people find it inherently amusing/pleasing to see authority figures (or in this day and age - celebrities) being sent up. This will especially be the case in countries where repressive regimes/dictators have been overthrown (and previous attempts to take the piss out of a politician could result in imprisonment). Impressionists are funny because they mock celebrities (gently, affectionately or otherwise). Their talent enables us to imagine we're listening to celebrities saying things they wouldn't normally say. The sheer skill of some impressionists is entertainment enough - and well written jokes just make their impressions more entertaining.
And John Culshaw is great. Better than Rory Bremner. I wish I could do good impressions, mostly Sid James's laugh.