Just to state, that photo posted by Nil is NOT the twins in question. [/legal]
A funny rape story? Page 2
Quote: Leevil @ October 7 2009, 1:51 PM BSTJust to state, that photo posted by Nil is NOT the twins in question.
Although the twins in the photo ARE rapists.
Rape = not funny under any circumstances, IMO 
Quote: Leevil @ October 7 2009, 1:51 PM BSTJust to state, that photo posted by Nil is NOT the twins in question. (/legal)
Quote: Kevin Murphy @ October 7 2009, 1:59 PM BSTAlthough the twins in the photo ARE rapists.
Quote: Leevil @ October 7 2009, 1:51 PM BSTJust to state, that photo posted by Nil is NOT the twins in question. [/legal]
Quote: Kevin Murphy @ October 7 2009, 1:59 PM BSTAlthough the twins in the photo ARE rapists.
Quote: Loopey @ October 7 2009, 1:59 PM BSTRape = not funny under any circumstances, IMO
What about when Jordan jumped on the rape horse not long ago in a desperate bid to make people not hate her as much?
Quote: Kevin Murphy @ October 7 2009, 1:59 PM BSTAlthough the twins in the photo ARE rapists.
>_<
Quote: Nil Putters @ October 7 2009, 1:48 PM BST
So who are these guys?
Quote: chipolata @ October 7 2009, 2:01 PM BSTWhat about when Jordan jumped on the rape horse not long ago in a desperate bid to make people not hate her as much?
Still not funny. Pathetic maybe.
Quote: chipolata @ October 7 2009, 2:03 PM BSTSo who are these guys?
X-Factor(y)
I think it was massively shit of them, but isn't rape all about non-consent, which wasn't the case?
Judging by the way the story ended, she didn't give consent to the other twin and then got kicked out of the bar for making a fuss about it. It's shit of them and rapey of them.
I always thought rape was sexual intercourse against your consent. When Twin 2 showed up, she didn't say no and did the nasty business.
Obviously, it was the humiliation after at the nightclub which was the sickener, but it's still not rape.
I think I'm having trouble with this one because if the situation were reveresed and I shagged one girl and then her sister took over, I wouldn't feel raped or humiliated, in fact, I'd probably take out a full page ad in the Times to brag about it.
Quote: Renegade Carpark @ October 7 2009, 2:16 PM BSTI always thought rape was sexual intercourse against your consent. When Twin 2 showed up, she didn't say no and did the nasty business.
She didn't know it was Twin 2, it was a "completely different" person having sex with her, without consent. I think it could easily be argued as rape.
You could make a pretty good legal argument that this chick only consented to shagging Twin A. She consented to the second shag, but not to shagging Twin B.
If her lawyer could convince a jury that her cooch is chattel, she could at the very least do them for fraud.