stimarco
Friday 4th September 2009 5:00am [Edited]
In a flat
29 posts
Newbie here. (WAVES.) Hi!
I did write an unused skit for practice a few years back, based around a single iGag. I might post it to the forums tomorrow to see what others think of it; constructive criticism is always good.
Anyway... I'll throw in my tuppence-worth.
I'm going to be brutal—it's the only way criticism can work—but please don't take any of this personally. It's not you; society's to blame:
Apple started the iBall rolling back in 1999 and I remember a number of these iJokes rattling around TV and radio shows of the early 2000s. Even the mighty iPod has been around since 2001, while the iPhone is three this year. Good iGags which nobody has heard before are therefore hard to find.
What struck me on my first read-through wasn't so much the iGags, but the structure itself. Although your script seems to be written for TV, you're not really taking advantage of that medium. For example, Apple's history and design aesthetics are ripe with visual gag opportunities.
For example, you could take the proverbial out of Steve Jobs' evangelistic streak this way. Instead of a picture of his flesh-and-blood family sitting on his desk, the Steve Jobs lookalike could have a bunch of family photos showing Apple kit (both old and new) instead of children—a Powerbook marrying a Mac mini, both 'dressed' as if at a human wedding, with the boss beaming fatuously alongside; an early iMac wearing a school uniform, that sort of thing. These are throwaway visual jokes, but they also set the scene and help build-up the verbal gags by conveying information about one of the skit's characters.
As it stands, the script feels more like a radio skit that's had the visual part added as an afterthought. Make *everything* count. Matt Groening and his team are a masters of quickfire visual gags.
Most people who are even remotely familiar with Apple know of Steve Jobs and are aware of Apple's iconic design aesthetic. Journalists have even invented the term "Reality Distortion Field" to explain Jobs' sales skills. These elements alone are rich seams of comedy gold, but are rarely touched upon as it's hard to produce a sketch that doesn't come across as geeky. As people have become more technology-savvy, I suspect this is less of a barrier than it once was.
It's harder for me to be objective about the stream of iGags. They seemed a bit obvious and predictable, but I'm obviously going to be jaded about these given my background. Even so, I think I'd recommend paring them down, so the few that you leave in have a bit more room to breathe.
That said, most people *don't* work in IT, so I'm probably not representative of a typical comedy audience.
I shall now shut up.