British Comedy Guide

The Man Who Talks To Camera

In the style of a fly-on-the-wall documentary.

*

EXT. A STREET. DAY.

DARREN WALKS DOWN THE STREET.

NARRATOR (V.O.):
On the surface, Darren Clarke appears to be a normal member of the British public. An HSBC branch manager, married with two children. But he harbours an unusual secret. Darren is one of a growing number of people in the UK who compulsively talk to camera.

CUT TO:

INT. A LIVING ROOM. DAY.

PETE AND HIS WIFE SIT ON THEIR COUCH. PETE ADDRESSES AN OFF-CAMERA INTERVIEWER.

PETE:
Well, we was in the pub when I first noticed. One second he's talking to me about the footy, all normal-like. Then he just looks off to his right and says to nobody: "Pete's such a fool. I've been banging his missus for months and he's none the wiser". Like he's Alfie or something. [BEAT] All rubbish, of course.

PETE'S WIFE LOOKS AWAY SHYLY.

PETE:
It took me and the lads a few weeks to figure it out. Geezer thinks he's got a film crew following him around. Mad.

CUT TO:

INT. A PUB. DAY.

DARREN AND HIS MATES ARE STANDING CHATTING, HAVING A LAUGH, AT THE OTHER SIDE OF THE ROOM.

NARRATOR (V.O.):
There's no known cause and, unfortunately for Darren, no known cure for this, what can be socially debilitating, affliction.

DARREN SUDDENLY LOOKS OFF TO THE RIGHT AND BEGINS TO DELIVER A CONFESSIONAL MONOLOGUE INTO EMPTY SPACE.

HIS MATES ALL WAIT UNCOMFORTABLY FOR HIM TO FINISH.

CUT TO:

INT. A PUB. DAY.

AT A TABLE WITH DARREN AND HIS MATES.

NARRATOR (V.O.):
In this documentary, we will give you an exclusive glimpse into the life of the man who talks to camera.

PETE:
Now that, what's her name, Jackie Brambles… I wouldn't kick her out of bed.

DAVE:
I'm more of a Fern Britton guy myself.

DARREN:
Fern Britton? You've got to be kidding. Can't be doing with the big girls. [TO CAMERA] Though, truth be told, I've knocked one out over her more than once.

HIS MATES SHIFT AWKWARDLY WHILE HE DELIVERS THE LINE TO CAMERA, THEN CARRY ON.

PETE:
Isn't she married to that Phillip Schofield?

DARREN:
[TO CAMERA] Him too.

HIS MATES ARE ALL STARING AT HIM.

PRODUCER (O.S.):
Sorry to interrupt. I don't think this is really working.

PETE:
What's wrong?

PRODUCER (O.S.):
It's Darren. He keeps talking to camera.

PETE:
Isn't that what you came here for?

PRODUCER (O.S.):
Well, yes. But, Darren, you keep talking to the actual camera. We're trying to get an insight into your normal life. Can you, you know, just pretend we're not here and talk to the 'other' camera?

DARREN:
Did you bring another camera?

PRODUCER (O.S.):
Well, no. I mean the 'other' camera. You know…

DARREN CLEARLY HAS NO IDEA WHAT SHE'S TALKING ABOUT.

DARREN:
[TO CAMERA] This bird's a f**king nutter.

END

That's great.

Trim this line though:

PETE:
It took me and the lads a few weeks to figure it out. Geezer thinks he's got a film crew following him around. Mad.

It's not needed. The less exposition on Darrens' behaviour, the better it is going to work.

DARREN SUDDENLY LOOKS OFF TO THE RIGHT AND BEGINS TO DELIVER A CONFESSIONAL MONOLOGUE INTO EMPTY SPACE.

I think you might need to actually write this bit!

Quote: Timbo @ August 18 2009, 1:19 PM BST

I think you might need to actually write this bit!

I see your point. The problem is, as soon as we get close enough for Darren to notice the actual camera, he's going to start talking to it.

If you add maybe a little more on the end.
It would be great for like one of those 5 minute wonder things on bbc three or comedy central or dave

Hi Kevin, interesting concept. The direction could be more important than the writing.

As Darren is a Bank Manager, I was expecting a financial gag or two. Parhaps say less about his job.

Quote: Geoff Mutton @ August 19 2009, 1:58 PM BST

As Darren is a Bank Manager, I was expecting a financial gag or two. Parhaps say less about his job.

Good call.

Quote: Kevin Murphy @ August 18 2009, 1:12 PM BST

PETE:
Well, we was in the pub when I first noticed. One second he's talking to me about the footy, all normal-like. Then he just looks off to his right and says to nobody: "Pete's such a fool. I've been banging his missus for months and he's none the wiser". Like he's Alfie or something. [BEAT] All rubbish, of course.

Confusing!! Who is he talking about?

Did you mean
PETE:
Well, we was in the pub when I first noticed. One second Darren is talking to me about the footy, all normal-like. Then he just looks off to his right and says to nobody: "Pete's such a fool. I've been banging his missus for months and he's none the wiser". Like he's Alfie or something. [BEAT] All rubbish, of course.

Yes, that's what I meant. Thought it was pretty obvious, truth be told.

Quote: Kevin Murphy @ August 19 2009, 11:19 PM BST

Yes, that's what I meant. Thought it was pretty obvious, truth be told.

Don't make the director/producer confused when he reads your scripts.

Quote: billwill @ August 19 2009, 11:27 PM BST

Don't make the director/producer confused when he reads your scripts.

That sounds like good advice, but I'm not sure why they would be confused.

Do you think that the first scene does not thoroughly establish Darren as the subject of the documentary, or is it something else?

Quote: Kevin Murphy @ August 19 2009, 11:32 PM BST

That sounds like good advice, but I'm not sure why they would be confused.

Do you think that the first scene does not thoroughly establish Darren as the subject of the documentary, or is it something else?

You have TWO interviewers, the real one & the virtual one. These cause confusion unless you are explicit about who is being referred to.

I had to go back & reread scene one several times while reading scene two to work out who you were talking about, at first I thought Pete was talking about Pete in the third person, but it did not make sense.

Others might make the same mistake. If it was the producer/director, your sketch would end up in the reject bin.

Two words changed clarify the scene and avoid anyone having to refer back.

Remember video scenes on TV cannot refer back unless you record them, so make it damn obvious who you are referring to.

Quote: billwill @ August 20 2009, 12:00 AM BST

You have TWO interviewers, the real one & the virtual one. These cause confusion unless you are explicit about who is being referred to.

I only have one interviewer. I don't know where you're getting the other one from, or what you mean by "virtual".

Quote: billwill @ August 20 2009, 12:00 AM BST

I had to go back & reread scene one several times while reading scene two to work out who you were talking about, at first I thought Pete was talking about Pete in the third person, but it did not make sense.

You're right, it wouldn't make sense if Pete was talking about himself in the third person. But why did you think that he was? Genuinely, I would like to know.

Quote: billwill @ August 20 2009, 12:00 AM BST

Others might make the same mistake. If it was the producer/director, your sketch would end up in the reject bin.

I can believe that.

Quote: billwill @ August 20 2009, 12:00 AM BST

Two words changed clarify the scene and avoid anyone having to refer back.

Agreed. And I'm definitely going to take your advice and make that change. If one person can get confused, others might too.

Quote: billwill @ August 20 2009, 12:00 AM BST

Remember video scenes on TV cannot refer back unless you record them, so make it damn obvious who you are referring to.

Yes. And on video it would be pretty obvious that Darren is not Pete, because we'd be able to see them.

Many thanks for the criticism. It could be useful. This is a sketch idea I've had in my head for many years, but this is the first time I've commited it to pixels, so I appreciate the feedback.

Quote: Kevin Murphy @ August 20 2009, 12:52 AM BST

You're right, it wouldn't make sense if Pete was talking about himself in the third person. But why did you think that he was? Genuinely, I would like to know.

Because in the English language indefinite words like He, She or It normally refer to a definite person or object in a previous sentence of the SAME paragraph. In your case you didn't mention Darren by name in the first sentence and the mention of him is actually in a prior paragraph in a scene far-far away in another galaxy.

So when speed reading my eye caught the name "Pete" just prior to the "Him" and associated the two together & this goes on until I encounter a jarring inconsistency. Then I have to go back & re-read what you wrote, several times, to work out what you actually meant to say.

Consider the following examples & see which ones jar on you and make you backtrack:

John is walking to the park. He is wearing a coat.
John and Jane are walking to the park, he is wearing a coat.
Roger and Jane are walking to the park, He is wearing a coat which gets in the way when he stops to pee against a tree.
Rover and Jane are walking to the park. It is wearing a leash, Jane waits while it pees against a tree.

Quote: billwill @ August 22 2009, 3:10 AM BST

Because in the English language indefinite words like He, She or It normally refer to a definite person or object in a previous sentence of the SAME paragraph. In your case you didn't mention Darren by name in the first sentence and the mention of him is actually in a prior paragraph in a scene far-far away in another galaxy.

So when speed reading my eye caught the name "Pete" just prior to the "Him" and associated the two together & this goes on until I encounter a jarring inconsistency. Then I have to go back & re-read what you wrote, several times, to work out what you actually meant to say.

I can't really take your criticism seriously after reading this, sorry.

Thanks for taking the time for the feedback.

No thanks for patronising me.

Quote: Kevin Murphy @ August 22 2009, 3:39 AM BST

I can't really take your criticism seriously after reading this, sorry.

Thanks for taking the time for the feedback.

No thanks for patronising me.

{shrug}

You asked!

At first, I didn't know WHY I first took "him" to refer to Pete, 'till I spent some time analysing it. Above was my deduction and explanation. If it happens to me it is quite likely to happen to professional Script Readers/Producers Directors who by nature of the size of the slush pile, probably have developed speed reading aspects.

You don't like it?

Tough! None of us like criticism but we need to live with it and use it to improve our work.

There are many possible small changes to your script which would avoid this particular possibility of confusion; if you didn't like the change I suggested above, then do a different one, but it does need some polish.

Share this page