Joe Jackson's Got To Be Starting Something
Shouldn't this be in Critique? 
Oh for f**k's sake!
Quote: Badge @ July 16 2009, 2:03 AM BSTShouldn't this be in the recycle bin?
I think your article is not as funny, as other articles I've read in The New Scientist and similar publications.
Personally, I was confused by the introduction of Ralph 'Piggy' Jacks. I liked the 'pelvic bone' but thought that the 'smallest of teats' came out of nowhere and didn't serve any purpose.
I was puzzled by the phrase; 'but it is understood that he either approves, disapproves, or doesn't give a shit, although not necessarily in that order, and certainly not in under 2000 words'. However, it makes a good filler.
Having said all this, I'm going to read 'Crime and Punishment' by Fyodor Dostoyevsky again - as having read your article, I need something to cheer me up.
LOL.
That was a critique! That was a critique! It should be in 'Critique'! That was a critique!
*runs around in circles*
*plays Benny Hill theme tune*
*taps small bald man on head repeatedly*
IT WAS A CRITIQUE!!!!
As the token girl, I'll be the scantily clad crowd of ladies is unflattering makeup...
Quote: Tim Walker @ July 16 2009, 3:19 AM BST*taps small bald man on head repeatedly*
I know it's big, but this is the third time I'm telling you this - That's not a small bald man.
*chases Andrea round and round the park*
Quote: Leevil @ July 16 2009, 3:21 AM BST
It could be a bald oriental man if there's a Jap eye.
Quote: Joseff @ July 16 2009, 3:24 AM BSTIt could be a bald oriental man if there's a Jap eye.
With an weeping infection? Only soothed by stroking a pussy?
