sootyj
Sunday 28th June 2009 10:03pm
51,287 posts
Quote: Matthew Stott @ June 28 2009, 5:56 PM BST
No bloody way. There is no chance in hell that I would have joined the army for two years. That's basically punishing people who've done nothing wrong and were never going to do anything wrong!
Punishing the innocent is a really good idea.
When people learn that society is neither fair nor predictable it'll instill the values respect have failed to.
Quote: DaButt @ June 28 2009, 5:56 PM BST
Wow. Never heard of it.
Well it's something the US got right. Hit the greedy criminal f**ks where it really hurts...their dinner.
N.B. Sweden, Germany even Israel all have none military national service. I did voluntary work with a bunch of Germans. Having to leave home for 2 years and find something to do to stay out of the army taught them useful independence skills.
The state demanding you grow up and move on is a good thing. Don't want the army then pick veggies, or work on a Kibbutz or help in a hospital.
Quote: Dolly Dagger @ June 28 2009, 6:17 PM BST
Sorry to hear about your daughter Bigfella and your justifiable anger.
Personally I don't think society is any more violent than in the past. I've heard enough stories about Glasgow in the '50s. Girls being more violent is a side-effect of gender equality. I also saw plenty of it in the 80s and 90s.
In my opinion violent crime all stems from one's early years and upbringing. Better parenting would solve the problem. Children that are raised very strictly are also prone to becoming un-emphatic and/or violent as those set no behaviour boundaries. Children raised with a healthy sense of right and wrong, good self-esteem and with unconditional love are highly unlikely to commit violent crimes and if they do are unlikely to re-offend with basic punishments.
For the first time I agreed with the government when they suggesting punishing disinterested parents.