Quote: Dolly Dagger @ March 31 2009, 6:10 PM BSTSounds like your problem is your ability, rather than the girls themselves.
Best leave them alone - sounds like they'd be mightily disappointed and probbaly won't waste any time letting everyone know.
Should I give a s**t about standards? Page 4
Quote: Gavin @ March 31 2009, 5:57 PM BSTIndeed the council has decided you are. Expect your membership pack in the post...*Snigger* member.
It was touch and go there for a while...
Do 'em both! No one lies on their deathbed saying 'If only I'd had less sex' (well, Freddie Mercury maybe).
However if this post is to be truly believed, you can be sure of one fact - the looker in question probably resembles Waynetta Slob and the rough one looks like Heather Trott from EastEnders.
It's not just fish and penis size that gets exaggerated by men.
I once heard the loveliest phrase for this situation - 'you don't look at the mantlepiece when you're poking the fire'. Makes you pround of your gender doesn't it?
Quote: Balf @ March 31 2009, 7:51 PM BSTI once heard the loveliest phrase for this situation - 'you don't look at the mantlepiece when you're poking the fire'. Makes you pround of your gender doesn't it?
The South Americans have a similar expression 'In the dark, all cats are gray'. I don't know if it makes me proud of our gender that we'll shag just about anything alive or dead.
Even the ugliest, crack addicted, street whores manage to have a full time boyfriend - though their baby sitting skills aren't usually the best. 
Quote: Renegade Carpark @ March 31 2009, 8:12 PM BSTEven the ugliest, crack addicted, street whores manage to have a full time boyfriend
Well yeah, but they're going out with ugly, crack addicted, sleep in their own piss man-whores, so it's all much of a muchness.
Quote: zooo @ March 31 2009, 8:28 PM BSTWell yeah, but they're going out with ugly, crack addicted, sleep in their own piss man-whores, so it's all much of a muchness.
That's no way to talk about Pete Doherty. 
Quote: Renegade Carpark @ March 31 2009, 8:51 PM BSTThat's no way to talk about Pete Doherty.
I thought this was a reference to Cheri blair???
Elliot nailed this. Kudos. A credit to his generation (Scatz included). If only the other buggers were as worthy of oxygen.
Lord Meldrum, self-castration will be less painful in the long term.
Quote: Lord Meldrum @ March 31 2009, 1:08 PM BSTMet these two females, one is hotter than the other and I'd have no problem giving her what for.......but the other girl is quite rough and not as hot (bit still quite pretty, just rough with it) but really really up for it. Should I just got for it, or keep my standards higher?
Do you know this comment would be almost funny if it CAME FROM A LABRADOR...
Ha this has been great. I love non-PC posts it's like light the touch paper and retire. Well for one you're a man so if you do have standards but they'll be pretty low. I'm excluding Aaron from that comment as he's semi-girl. And Slagg A as he's from a well known species of Clanger.
Anyhoo in short shag the less attractive one, whoever he is.
Quote: SlagA @ March 31 2009, 10:12 PM BSTElliot nailed this. Kudos. A credit to his generation (Scatz included). If only the other buggers were as worthy of oxygen.
Lord Meldrum, self-castration will be less painful in the long term.
Self-castration for fancying two women at the same time? Seems a bit harsh under your regime...er, Slag.
Poor Lord Meldrum, he only came on here for some relationship advice and you're all set to physically mutilate the man.
If a woman posted on here saying she fancied two men, all the female posters (and some of the male) would have waded in with overwhelmingly positive, girl power, right on sister helpful advice.
It's political correctness gone mad! 
P.S. I know Lord Meldrum's post is probably a wind up, but the over reaction on here has made me chuckle.
I can't see what precludes asking for a threesome (unless Mel's opening post was a wind-up). It's amazing what you get just by asking.
I thought that he liked the first girl, but she wasn't on offer. Her hard featured friend was. So it's not a threesome;it's a gruesome twosome, a onesome or a nonesome. Why would anyone sleep with someone that they felt contempt for? 
Quote: Little Jersey Devil @ April 1 2009, 2:42 AM BSTWhy would anyone sleep with someone that they felt contempt for?
Drunk, needed the money? Sympathy shag? Desperate and horny? Although you're right, mutual respect really should be a prerequisite to a shag, let alone a relationship.