Lee Henman
Tuesday 27th January 2009 7:18pm [Edited]
5,183 posts
Quote: DaButt @ January 27 2009, 2:06 PM GMT
Why should you have the right to own a carving knife? A pair of scissors? A can of gasoline? Rat poison? An automobile? A bucket of water?
You can kill someone with all of those, but should the government have the right to keep you from possessing them? We have laws that deal with murder and assault for those who choose to murder and assault. But what about law-abiding citizens? Should they be treated as potential criminals, or trusted to do the right thing and follow the law? You can't legislate morality, but you can disarm law-abiding citizens and ensure that only criminals possess guns. F**k that.
But this is the whole point isn't it? People CAN'T be trusted with guns. If they could, there wouldn't be an issue. Time and time again we see horrors from the US filling our TV screens - some Emo kid with a grudge mowing down his schoolmates, snipers picking off innocent people in the street - and still Americans insist on the right to bear arms. I think the whole idea of having the "right" to kill in defence is so deeply-entrenched in the American psyche that it's futile to argue. But the point that guns are the same as knives is a ridiculous one. How far would the Columbine murderers have got armed with knives before they were stopped?
Put freely-available guns into any society and innocents will always suffer.
The other thing that astounds me are these American Christians and God-fearin' folk who go to church on a Sunday and always say grace before a meal, but have a shotgun in the cupboard "just in case". Hello? Thou Shalt Not Kill?