Quote: Griff @ December 30 2008, 12:49 AM GMTBy "how people talk" I just mean the phrases, idioms, styles of speech etc that different sorts of people typically use, rather than the exact content. I'm not talking about nuances, voice tones, pitches etc.
Why is this so controversial? I wish I'd never f**king said anything. What's so crazy about saying "If you're going to write a posh character, try and listen to some real posh people talking"?
I see so many sketches and sitcom extracts in Critique where people decide to write a posh person and write a load of caricatured pantomime rubbish "I say! What! What! Tally-ho!" when ten minutes of bothering to listen to actual posh people talk (on Radio Three if you can't find real ones) would give you a clue how upper class people actually talk. Similarly why not take five minutes to eavesdrop on the loudmouthed Mum in the doctor's waiting room shouting abuse at the receptionist. What words is she actually using? Or the middle-class twits in John Lewis debating which chenille throw would best suit the front room in their buy-to-let flat.
Next time writing tips come up maybe I'll just cut and paste something out of the user guide to Microsoft Word.
I think writing's to complex to have fixed rules on what works.
Often I'm guilty of cliched dialogue, but usually for a purpose (and not just because I'm a remorseless sociopath who can't percieve others).
If I'm writing a 1 page sketch, then innit=chav or crivens=Scottish. Allows me in a handful of words to give you all the background you need before the inevitable nasty punchline.
But if I'm writing a character piece or heaven forfend a sitcom pilot then that language just sounds awful and fake.
And in that case a subtley modified version of real speach is just the ticket.