Quote: zooo @ November 9 2008, 4:19 PM GMTor a mag with naked chicks in?
Isn't that a porn mag?
Who do you fancy? Page 286
Quote: zooo @ November 9 2008, 4:19 PM GMTIs a chick mag a mag for chicks, or a mag with naked chicks in?
Mag for chicks.
Ahh ok.
Best not to comment on it then. 
More! would have made more sense. Now that is a chick's mag that DOES make men look simple.
Hate that mag.
Quote: zooo @ November 9 2008, 4:22 PM GMTMore! would have made more sense. Now that is a chick's mag that DOES make men look simple.
Hate that mag.
Is that still going??!
Quote: zooo @ November 9 2008, 4:22 PM GMTAhh ok.
Best not to comment on it then.More! would have made more sense. Now that is a chick's mag that DOES make men look simple.
Hate that mag.
Well next time I will endeavour to fully research a quip.
Quote: Gavin @ November 9 2008, 4:25 PM GMTWell next time I will endeavour to fully research a quip.
Teehee!
Should think so too.
Yeah unfortunately More is still going.
Last time I found it interesting or useful I was about 11, despite the fact that it's apparently targeted at women in their 20s and 30s.
Of course, all of these magazines have one thing in common.
They make their reader look simple.
No Mr Bond I expect you to "ged it on!"
I like her hair.
Quote: Nil Putters @ November 9 2008, 4:29 PM GMTNo Mr Bond I expect you to "ged it on!"
Quote: Aaron @ November 9 2008, 4:29 PM GMTI like her hair.
Quote: Aaron @ November 9 2008, 4:29 PM GMTI like her hair.
Her bikini top looks superimposed on.
Quote: JuliaC @ November 9 2008, 4:30 PM GMTHer bikini top looks superimposed on.
Oooh *looks for original* 
Quote: Nil Putters @ November 9 2008, 4:30 PM GMT
Her hair. I like it. It is nice.
Nice boobs too. [/stereotypical Putters]