Seefacts
Friday 3rd October 2008 8:57pm
4,203 posts
Quote: Aaron @ October 3 2008, 5:51 PM BST
But it wouldn't work as a standalone 'sketch' - or at least it wouldn't work in the same way - without Popeye having been mentioned by one of the characters.
Like Chris's foray into the world of modelling, back in season 2 I think. The cutaways to Kate Moss floating out of an open window when there's a slight breeze, or falling through gaps between floorboards, wouldn't work if it hadn't already been set up that models are shockingly thin.
The beauty's in that out-of-the-blue short, sharp shock of surreality. But if you don't like surreal, then I guess it's understandable that you wouldn't appreciate those parts of Family Guy.
I think it looks worse in the narrative. As a sketch, it does work though. surely they could have had one of the characters watching Popeye if they wanted to get the gag in that badly?
I do like surreal, and the satire elements of the show are quite good (re: culture, telly etc) but the premise is quite dull and charmless.
Quote: zooo @ October 3 2008, 5:53 PM BST
Hee! That is exactly what I was imagining.
I enjoyed it quite a lot.
I did throw it on the floor. It was a bit like that time I was a contestant on Wheel of Fortune (cut to reasonably something funny, but totally unrelated)
And Stewie's line of 'Do we have a clip . . . I thought we had a clip? . . . no? Fine." just smacked 'If we take the piss out of our lack of structure first, no one else can'.