Griff
Sunday 21st September 2008 6:45pm [Edited]
993 posts
Kingsley Amis used to split people into "berks" and "wankers", where a "berk" is someone who cares less about English than you do, and a "wanker" is someone who cares more.
It's a similar situation with appreciating art, isn't it.
People who see more in a piece of art than we do, we tend to consider as pretentious twits, reading in meanings that aren't actually there, just to sound clever. Jolanta thinks 'Office' fans are in this category.
People who see less in a piece of art that we do, we tend to consider as thick and uncultured because they cannot interpret the art "correctly". The 'Office' fans on BSG consider Jolanta to be in this category.
But it's mostly subjective, EXCEPT where there is a genuine objective test - which is whether your understanding of the art matches the artist's intention.
So if (to pick an obvious example) Armando Ianucci intends his Malcolm Tucker character to be a spoof of Alistair Campbell, and 90% of his viewers understand that, then the 10% who interpret it as a spoof of Dale Winton are definitively wrong. (However, if Armando Ianucci intended Malcolm Tucker to be a spoof of Alistair Campbell, and 0% of his viewers interpreted it that way, then it is Ianucci who has got his art wrong.)
What's the situation with the Office? Who knows. I've no idea if for every viewer who watches it and "gets it", there's another ten who don't. All I know is I "get' it, and it works for me. If it doesn't work for Jolanta, well, she's got plenty of other shows to watch, like Balamory or Dick And Dom In Da Bungalow.