SlagA
Thursday 4th September 2008 1:32pm [Edited]
Blackwood
5,335 posts
The art (which I guess means it's an aesthetic perfection that no one will reach) is to maintain the essence of character while using the bare essentials or most concise dialogue.
As David says, no one wants to hear dreary real life ramblings and tautology (unless they're the Slagg Brothers' script editor) as it's tedium and you can get 90 minutes of it for free on all public transport.
Real speech is so littered with tautology (as in Sooty's 'mental' example), gaps, and sidetracks that the art comes in selecting the key moments. For example, when we watch / hear / read fiction (in all forms) we aren't presented wuth the whole totality of what happened, we are presented with the edited highlights, the crucial moments. The scriptwriter's goal is prune (what they see as) the non-essential.
As much as I love Woody Allen, his constant interruptions and stutters sometimes work superbly and sometimes bug the daylights out of me. Husbands and Wives (chaotic camerawork and everyone cutting in, talking over, and stammering) is for me one of his harder films to watch - although it might be argued its his most realistic. But even his stutters and tautology are carefully worked out. Apparently tapes of his standup years reveal almost identical gaps and stammers between venues.
Our job as writers is to present a heavily edited and entertaining fabrication of 'reality' not to replicate it in its mind-numbing banality.