http://www.mikeonads.com/2008/07/13/using-your-browser-url-history-estimate-gender/
My results were worringly...
94% Female
6% Male
Yikes!
http://www.mikeonads.com/2008/07/13/using-your-browser-url-history-estimate-gender/
My results were worringly...
94% Female
6% Male
Yikes!
It's all those knitting sites.
Mine (unsurprisingly) came up 97% Donkey, 3% indeterminate.
Mostly male. Fair reflection on me, probably.
I came out as 55% male, 45% female, but it seems to based on only two sites, Apple and the Guardian. As all the other sites I visit are football or porn related that might tip the balance a bit.
Ha ha - I was just about to post the same thing!
To Griff's post - not Timbos.
I'm 55% male, apparently. Quite surprised I'm not more feminine. :/
Quote: Timbo @ August 3 2008, 6:51 PM BSTthe Guardian
YOU SICKEN ME! *shakes fist menacingly*
53% female, 47% male. It's as if it had said "Your boobs are too small". That machine is an arsehole.
*goes to knitting website for gender adjustment*
This site didn't come up on the analysis. Which is annoying. I guess it would've rated it 50/50?
Quote: Simon Stratton @ August 3 2008, 6:52 PM BSTHa ha - I was just about to post the same thing!
To Griff's post - not Timbos.
You don't visit football and porn related sites?
Quote: Finck @ August 3 2008, 6:55 PM BST53% female, 47% male. It's as if it had said "Your boobs are too small". That machine is an arsehole.
*goes to knitting website for gender adjustment*
That's terrible. If you want an impartial judge, just PM me a pic and I'll clear things up for you? Obviously topless, it makes the measurements easier.
Quote: Aaron @ August 3 2008, 6:54 PM BSTYOU SICKEN ME! *shakes fist menacingly*
Yes, I was a little ashamed of that. But don't be too disgusted, it is mainly porn sites.
The Guardian website is great. I don't think animal porn would count either way Timbo.
74% Male.
Apparently it's my looking up tabloidy stories on the Sun.
57% female, 43% male. Just a little androgynous, website wise, then.