I'd quite like to see an anniversary story with several Doctors in it. Possibly only Davison, and McCoy onwards could get away with it now, but how nice it would be to see Paul McGann appear with some of the others.
Doctor Who Page 49
Quote: Bad dog @ May 7 2008, 5:41 PM BSTI'd quite like to see an anniversary story with several Doctors in it. Possibly only Davison, and McCoy onwards could get away with it now, but how nice it would be to see Paul McGann appear with some of the others.
It would be great, I have this great idea for an episode, whereby Tennants Doctor seems to have dissapeared and his companions and friends are having to cope without him against some massive threat, say, the Daleks, and theyre just about beaten when we hear the Tardis-it materialises-but out steps McGanns Doctor; and we scream into the end credits!! I need to get a life . . .
Please nobody with waistcoats or silly question mark umbrellas.
Cricket jumpers and long coloured scarves are fine.
That's a brilliant cliffhanger, Matthew. I wouldn't know what to do all week waiting for the resolution!
I think the two Bakers are looking a bit too old now, for credibility. Davison and McCoy can just about get away with it, and McGann would be fine.
Bearing in mind that it's the 45th anniversary this year, and the 50th is some way off, I don't think it will happen. Of course, if the current team can bring back K9 and Sarah Jane, then who knows? Some people thought the appearance of Davison in the Children in Need special was to pave the way for something.
Quote: Matthew Stott @ May 7 2008, 5:37 PM BSTIf Im wrong about Tom Baker and Leela then Im wrong, who cares?
That would be fine, except you wrote this:
Quote: Matthew Stott @ May 5 2008, 12:02 PM BSTNo, he wasnt at it with Leela; she actually didnt get on with Baker that well in real life; it was, as Winterlight says, Lalla Ward; Romana mark 2.
You flatly contradict someone without any deference to any knowledge they might have and then when they get peeved you say; 'whatever, I didn't care anyway.' Most people would get the hump with that sort of behaviour.
Quote: Godot Taxis @ May 7 2008, 5:57 PM BSTYou flatly contradict someone without any deference to any knowledge they might have and then when they get peeved you say; 'whatever, I didn't care anyway.' Most people would get the hump with that sort of behaviour.
No they wouldnt, I assumed youd got the wrong person and tried to correct you; if it turns out Im wrong then Im wrong. You never stated you had any inside knowledge so it was a fair assumption youd just plumped for the wrong Baker companion. Now stop niggling at me, Im sure you have more important things in your life to worry about than me; and name calling is for children, so lets stop that as well.
Matthew the Patthew 
Quote: ian_w @ May 7 2008, 6:02 PM BSTMatthew the Patthew
You rotter . . . Im telling teacher . . . 
'I'm telling teacher'
Stott the swot.
Quote: Marc P @ May 7 2008, 6:06 PM BST'I'm telling teacher'
Stott the swot.
A Mum of one of my friends used to call me Matthew Snot, then laugh like an idiot. She was about forty.
Have you got her number?
She could have been saying my son's stupid but Mathhew's not.
Quote: Matthew Stott @ May 7 2008, 6:08 PM BSTA Mum of one of my friends used to call me Matthew Snot, then laugh like an idiot. She was about forty.
How old is she now?
Quote: Winterlight @ May 7 2008, 9:26 PM BSTHow old is she now?
Shes dead. I killed her. A man can only be pushed so far.
Tell that to gravity.
I don't know if that makes any sense.
Here zooo.
I saw this and thought of you........
http://www.sfx.co.uk/page/sfx?entry=make_your_own_doctor_who