Is it really true? Seems bizarre that animal rights groups haven't already stopped it.
If it is, I vote we capture the c**t and make a nice piece of artwork out of him. Or his kids.
General, General Thread Page 222
It is true. Click on the petition link and you can see all the official stuff.
Will do.
zooo! 7,500 posts!
Anyway. Yeah. F**king backwards, that lot. And all artists are c**ts. I bet Ruby supports the guy though.
What makes you think that?
So the "free Tibet" petition is on hold till we sort out the dog then?
That's fine... No problemo
I don't necessarily have a problem with him calling it 'art'. As the word art shouldn't mean 'good' or 'worthwhile' or 'beautiful'.
He should be stopped though. He must think he's so f**king cutting edge. What a pathetic ludicrous c**t.
Very well said.
Quote: Scatterbrained Floozy @ April 17 2008, 8:32 PM BSTWhat makes you think that?
Because she's arty. And into all of that performance, exhbitionary art rubbish.
I think she'd want people to be nice to doggies more though.
Petition signed. My good gods, how can anyone be so conceited as to think that what they have done ( and have the ordasity to then call it art. )
People like this, who can justify to themselves, the needless cruelty that has been displayed here, should be dragged into the street tied to a lamp post, and beaten to within an inch of their lives with a traffic cone.
And lets face it if Guillermo Vargas was to try anything similar in the U.K. the RSPCA would be all over him.
He has just made my list of people who truly need a punch in the face.
It actually sounds a bit like something from Nathan Barley. But darker.
Like that 'piss' artist.
Sorry I wouldn't know. I'm fairly un-cultured
But I'll find out now....
Wohooo... lets try and get everyone to sign the petition on BSG! Thanks Nobby!
No problem Ellie.
Thats a great idea, maybeif people looked at this piece of 'art' they could get the whole picture. It really is atrocious.
Also, I LOVE your hat!