Nooo! The Doctor was about to take him and keep him as an adorable little pet in the tardis where they could have had lovely homoerotic adventures through time and space.
She ruined everything!
Who do you fancy? Page 42
Lol
The HomoErotic Adventures of Dr. Who
By Zoooo
Quote: Gavin @ April 4 2008, 11:39 PM BSTLol
The HomoErotic Adventures of Dr. Who
By Zoooo
Where the Doc whacks off to pictures of his past selves.
Quote: Curt @ April 4 2008, 11:45 PM BST
Oh my god. You GENIUS!!
Quote: Curt @ April 4 2008, 11:45 PM BST
Dude! 
thats probably why he has such a big warddrobe.......ahhh man now look what you done!
Quote: zooo @ April 4 2008, 11:38 PM BSTNooo! The Doctor was about to take him and keep him as an adorable little pet in the tardis where they could have had lovely homoerotic adventures through time and space.
She ruined everything!
Quote: zooo @ April 4 2008, 11:38 PM BSTNooo! The Doctor was about to take him and keep him as an adorable little pet in the tardis where they could have had lovely homoerotic adventures through time and space.
She ruined everything!
She can ruin my everything any time she wants!
Erm...?
Quote: zooo @ April 4 2008, 11:45 PM BSTOh my god. You GENIUS!!
What, David Tennant masturbating to Sylvester McCoy and Tom Baker? Classy.
Quote: Gavin @ April 4 2008, 11:39 PM BSTLol
The HomoErotic Adventures of Dr. Who
By Zoooo
Does the extra 'o' mean anything?
Just the way its said.
"By Zoooo" then it stars fading into the DR.Who theme music
Quote: Gavin @ April 4 2008, 11:52 PM BSTJust the way its said.
"By Zoooo" then it stars fading into the DR.Who theme music
Ahhh! 
I thought the extra 'o', given the context, was referring to an event! 
Quote: Aaron @ April 4 2008, 11:50 PM BSTWhat, David Tennant masturbating to Sylvester McCoy and Tom Baker? Classy.
Well okay, maybe not.
But to Peter Davison and McGann?
I will take that, sir. Yes I will.
Quote: ian_w @ April 4 2008, 11:51 PM BSTDoes the extra 'o' mean anything?
Multiples?
Quote: zooo @ April 4 2008, 11:55 PM BSTWell okay, maybe not.
But to Peter Davison and McGann?
I will take that, sir. Yes I will.
I'm not quite sure of what a suitable response to this is!
Pity?
Erm...