Quote: fasty @ 20th September 2023, 12:32 PMExactly. As far as I'm aware (I've stopped reading all the dross after day one) none of these 'victims or survivors' has gone to the police or appointed a legal representative. They've run to the press, some of them after sitting on it (phnaaar) for twenty years.
I don't like the bloke or at least his persona as projected. Saw him on tele a few times years ago and since then I've consciously avoid anything he's on. As I said elsewhere the episode of QI he's on is the only one I have never watched. I often watch several old episodes on the trot if there's nowt else on.
As mentioned, Cliff ...
The C4 documentary "In plain sight" lays out a mountain of evidence. The Law acts on probability, at the lower level of crime it's "balance of probability" but in criminal court, it needs to be "beyond reasonable doubt." . Your word against theirs still isn't sufficient, and the Police shy away when someone rich and famous is involved due to the PR backlash. But in Cliff's case, they needed to get a search warrant, which is hard to get and normally means someone is blocking an investigation. But how do you get "beyond reasonable doubt" if someone does block police investigations or pays people to keep quiet ?