billwill
Friday 2nd June 2023 12:49pm
North London
6,162 posts
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Just out of interest, I asked ChatGPT:
What is your definition of a human being
and it replied:
As an AI language model, I don't possess personal beliefs or opinions, but I can provide a general definition of a human being.
A human being is a member of the Homo sapiens species, characterized by their biological, cognitive, and social attributes. Biologically, humans are primates with distinct physical features, including an upright posture, opposable thumbs, and a highly developed brain.
Cognitively, humans possess advanced thinking abilities, including reasoning, problem-solving, language skills, and self-awareness. They have the capacity for conscious thought, introspection, and the ability to reflect on their own existence.
Socially, humans are highly social creatures, forming complex social structures, cultures, and societies. They engage in cooperative behavior, communication, and the development of shared norms, values, and systems of governance. Humans have a strong need for social connection and often form deep emotional bonds with others.
Humans also display a wide range of emotions, experiences, and subjective consciousness. They have the capacity for empathy, compassion, and moral reasoning, which influence their interactions with other individuals and the world around them.
It's important to note that the definition of a human being can vary across different contexts, cultures, and perspectives. Different disciplines, such as biology, anthropology, psychology, and philosophy, offer diverse perspectives on what it means to be human.
So to it, humans are defined as being members of Homo Sapiens. That amounts to saying humans are humans, so I don't think it could really use the 3 Asimov laws.
???
~~~~~~~~~~
It does 'know' what the 3 laws are and what they mean, though:
I asked: What are Asimov's three laws
and it replied:
Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics are a set of rules introduced by science fiction writer Isaac Asimov in his works. They are as follows:
First Law: A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
This law emphasizes the primacy of human safety and well-being. It states that a robot must not cause harm to humans, either directly or by failing to prevent harm when it has the ability to do so.
Second Law: A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
This law highlights the importance of human authority over robots. It states that a robot must follow the commands and instructions of humans, unless those orders would result in harm to humans, thus taking precedence over the First Law.
Third Law: A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
The third law emphasizes the preservation of a robot's own existence, provided that it does not violate the First or Second Law. This law acknowledges that robots have a vested interest in self-preservation but places it as a lower priority compared to human safety.
These laws were initially introduced in Asimov's science fiction stories as a means to explore the potential ethical and moral dilemmas surrounding advanced artificial intelligence and robotics. They have become iconic and have influenced subsequent discussions and depictions of robotics in popular culture.