Rupert Bear
Sunday 13th February 2022 8:18pm [Edited]
56 posts
Quote: gappy @ 13th February 2022, 7:31 PM
I promise I have nothing against you personally (though your "abomination" statement didn't set me jumping for joy) I just think that your arguments are flawed and poorly expressed.
But, I do appreciate the response above, though I'm afraid I still don't find your logic entirely convincing.
Firstly, the Critique section of this message board, whee amateurs toss around new ideas is not really a barometer of British comedy, so we'll ignore that.
It's interesting that you note that comedians were once as famous as pop stars. Funny thing is, pop stars now aren't as famous as pop stars were - Kanye West and Billy Eilish are a fraction as influential as Madonna, Prince or Freddie Mercury once were (excuse the abomination-adjacent references). I think all you're describing is the fragmentation of culture and the end of the shared reference (I actually think that this makes comedy harder to write, but I think the effect is incidental).
Touching on knighthoods, I'm not sure it's hugely relevant. Firstly, it's not my litmus test for importance, but also Lenny Henry got his in 2015, 30 years since he was famous. Tony Robinson around the same time. We'd need to wait until at least 2030 to find an equivalency in the cases of Stewart Lee or Bob Mortimer.
But more significantly, I feel you're naive to think that comedians in the past were free to say precisely what they wanted. Ignoring the fact that swearing and explicit sexual references are now OKand were once stringently controlled - compare a Connelly routine from the 70s and the 00s for proof - but also religion and other morally sensitive areas were once off-limits, at least where things were recorded...in some ways, the real change in today's world,regarding sensitivity and censorship, is that everything is recorded, or at least we act as if it might be. Different things are taboo now, but this is not proof that taboo is a new thing.
Your final challenge is interesting. Of course, in countries where free speech is significantly curtailed, we inevitably get very little culture filtering through. But, more importantly, I can't really name you any comedians from foreign non-Anglophone nations without oppressive regimes, because of the nature of the art. Don't ask me my favourite Belgian comedian, for example. So, I guess this won't help us solve this issue.
As it happens, I'm no cheerleader for lots of things in our current society, but I still don't believe they are generally the reason why you don't like comedies now as much asBlackadder.
"Abomination statement", oh gappy, I haven't even started yet.
Pet dislikes:
Loud rap music,
Those 'turkish' style haircuts, bald half-way up the head with a clump left on top.
Intimidating 'Plastic gangster' white youths shouting 'YO innit' as though they came from Jamaica. (I wish I was 40 years younger you scumbags)!
Dope smokers.
Forum trolls. (Now there's one that many here will identify with).
There's more, but you get the gist.
Pet hates:
Am I allowed to say this? Celery! God, I HATE the stuff. If a stick of celery was human I'd kill it!
It's strange you should say I've nothing against you personally, because I seem to be the favourite topic here. No doubt because the attempt at comedy here is so awful there really isn't anything else to focus on.
I'm well aware the critque section is not a professional one, but it is a showcase. Could I do any better? No, not with censorship.
Yes, you're right to say that pop-stars aren't a patch on what they were. Why would that be? Culture? As culture changes it produces consequences and today's popular 'rap' is the outcome of that. A mindless noise with a heavy tribal beat. Not pleasant on the ears, but perfectly diverse and multicultural. Ticks all the right boxes.
You give me two names I assume are today's comedians, Stewart Lee and Mortimer. I'm sorry, I've never heard of them. Have you heard of Les Dawson or Bernard Manning or Ken Dodd? That's the difference.
I think you're wrong to say comedy was previously censored. Python's 'The Life of Brian' was hugely criticized, but never banned. Swear words were often not heard, but that's because the comedy was so good they weren't needed. If a comedy script needs to include swear words I assume the content is so poor it needs the shock effect.
Actually, my challenge to find a comedian from a censored society was a loaded question and that's because eventually speech control destroys comedy and that's why you don't see any. Think back to The Life of Brian, based around skits of Christ. Imagine doing that today about Allah?! Ken Dodd, stopping just short of being sexually explicit. Manning and his women jokes targetting the audience ... They wouldn't last two minutes today. If they were the great comedians, it's why we now have a politically correct watered down version of blandness.