Quote: chipolata @ March 14, 2008, 10:07 AMIsn't the problenm with the Carry On films that their success was very much tied to the rather oddball cast (Kenneth Williams, Sid James, Bernard Breslaw, etc) and a very specific type of humour that reached it's peak in the seventies and then died away. For better or worse, we've moved on, and any new attempts to redo the films aren't going to be filled by todays top comedians, but ex soap actors, reality stars and anybody else who's been in Heat.
Agree entirely. And with Writer2k as well, though I'm still not familiar with how to do multiple quotes.
Anyway...
...the best Carry Ons worked because they had an oddball cast and the era was one in which innuendo worked in its own right (and not in some post-modern way) due to the sexual mores of the time. It's no surprise that they got really crap in the seventies - there was no reason to go oo-er any more, because there was a lot of oo-er in real life, other films and media in general anyway. And the great Talbot Rothwell wasn't doing the scripts any more.
I'm afraid that any new Carry On will be a celebrity-fest and will end up like Spiceworld. Unlike that film, I won't be going to see it at the cinema.
EDIT: Nearly forgot to *wave fist* at Sooty for joining the Chaplin-bashers.