A Horseradish
Tuesday 14th April 2020 7:49pm [Edited]
8,475 posts
There were 50 million deaths worldwide from Spanish Flu in 1918-19. Currently "coronavirus" deaths are a comparable drop in the ocean. Arthur Firstenberg described in "The Invisible Rainbow" how three sets of exercises were undertaken to deliberately infect 100 well people. One involved smearing infected snot all over their hands. Another involved sticking it up their nose. The third involved getting infected people to sneeze directly into their mouths. Lovely I must say. Whatever, 300 exercises all told and not one - not one - of them got the Spanish Flu. Of itself, this is weird, troubling and suspicious.
Microscope technology had only recently improved.They now had machines which could see much tinier things. The tiny things they saw were declared to be viruses (the word had hitherto just meant poisons) and obviously some behaved differently in movement to others. They called one Spanish Flu. This justified the importance of the new technology. It did nothing for the 50 million who died. But with this, germ science was born and no one after that ever questioned it.
Old Arthur himself had a long, long, history of being troubled by electricity and microwaves and he would have hated 5G. Nevertheless what he describes is almost certainly true even if it led him to the conclusion that illness was caused by these external phenomena affecting us all and not via anything called a virus involving human to human transmission.
My own theory works on the idea that exosomes which look almost identical to the so-called Covid-19 are indeed here exosomes. It is understood that exosomes are a natural bodily way of trying to get rid of what the body perceives to be poisons. Most scientists accept the existence of exosomes. But most scientists also say this is a virus and the conspiracy people say no. It is an exosomic defence against something which isn't a virus. It's possibly electro waves.
But my theory considers that exosomic activity is being triggered from something internal rather than external so that it is neither human to human transmission or electronically transmitted. That internal something - I am not going to give the game wholly away at this stage - hovers around our natural genetic programming which means that we as humans instinctively act to resolve conflict. It views the potential to acquire an illness from something external as conflict and then the exosomes activate as an insurance policy for wellness and peace. But, I will argue, it is a misreading by the body. The release is to the threat of panic about an imagined external virus. When global, that happens in huge numbers.
I am especially interested in what appear to be similarities in DNA considerations when it comes to viruses and panic disorders. I have always claimed that DNA was no more that a language and rather being an absolute truth is likely to be subject to many interpretations. As a starting point I have identified what is an obvious overlap between Micro-RNAs and methylome when it comes to panic mechanisms and what are believed to be virus mechanisms. I have at least eight more papers on this matter and am currently pumping them all towards HMG whether they like it or not. Even some of it may in time reach the independent Dominic Cummings though I hear he currently believes he has coronavirus symptoms.
Micro-RNA's contribute to risk for panic disorder
(Science Daily/Elsevier, 2011)
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/03/110324103618.htm
Role of microRNAs in Coronavirus-induced encephalitis
(Drexel University, Philadelphia)
https://grantome.com/grant/NIH/R21-AI088423-01A1
Epigenetic Landscape during Coronavirus Infection including consideration of methylome
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5371896/
The DNA methylome in panic disorder
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41398-019-0648-6