Quote: Billy Bunter @ 13th October 2019, 7:14 PM
I have nothing against Miss Thunberg herself. We were all naively idealistic in our youth. My criticism would be of the world leaders, from the Pope downwards, who indulge her and listen to her every word. Nobody listened to my every word when I was 16 and thought I had all the answers.
Strangely, now that I have 51 years' more experience and consequently do now have all the answers, still nobody listens to me.
I identify closely with these comments.
Obviously I can't speak for females as I never was one and will never be one but I know how it was for us males in the 1970s. We were at the tail end of the post war era when no one was allowed to talk back even to a dead-end teacher, let alone lecture to world powers, and if he did he would be given a thrashing. I was about as compliant as it comes - too much so for a boy really : easily intimidated - and yet I still managed to find my backside on the end of a 60 year old head master's slipper at 7 at my state junior school. When on my free pass to the posh fee paying school I saw many fingers bloodied. In woodwork/metalwork class, barely a week went by at 12 and 13 without a razor like metal ruler being smashed through someone's fingers though thankfully not my own. Many years later, I did on the way home from work regularly bump into someone who had been there. We swapped memory notes. He confirmed that I had not imagined it.
The state sector senior school I would have attended had it not been for passing my exams was the last place in the country to retain caning. It was on the front page of the Mail in 1979 for having the highest caning figures in the UK and most parents loved it. When the head left - he had undertaken every one including on students who had seen smoking a fag on a Sunday - many Mums were in tears. That is, even though he persisted with it long after it was made illegal. No one, obviously, spoke about the inevitability that it gave him an erection as sex was in the day to day deemed culturally non-existent. That was especially true of the homosexuality in married men with families which often took a sadistic turn.
Bear in mind this was post hippy and even just post punk so society had seen huge changes but in a sense those movements arose as an alternative outlet for opposing deference. It was why people wore leather jackets, big boots and pins through their noses and got into aggro with each other. It was the only perceived route towards the beginnings of having any adult clout. Not that I did it. I guess I was more like a V-necked jumper Undertone. Feargal Sharkey is currently doing brilliant stuff on the devastation of our water courses which he describes as our equivalent to the destruction of the Amazon but he is doing it in a quiet, genuine and experienced way. There is no showiness and no winding up of the law.
Where I was, there was by 16 a lot of cheek meted out from the students towards teachers and some liberal teachers actively encouraged its "normal laddishness" but it was done in a way in which everyone knew what the boundaries were. All of that cheek was essentially powerless although there were the brief moments when I witnessed a kind of Bullingdon thing at first hand against the drippiest teachers. One was locked inside a first floor classroom for a lunchtime just because he was nice-ish but weak. He ended up almost jumping to his death from a window. I didn't like him but was appalled.
I was not the norm, though. As someone who almost certainly lived with something diagnosable although I kept it to myself so it was never diagnosed, I could hardly look at anyone in the eye between 11 and 16 if we weren't talking and regularly shook wherever I sensed that others had power which was almost everywhere. People would read the writing which could be unusually fiery and say "I can't believe this is the same bloke" and while overcome it never fully goes away.
Personally, I'd say that was more of an autistic thing than being able to travel round the globe telling Presidents and Prime Ministers what to do or otherwise I'll sulk. I don't actually see real pain in her. The pain of environmental concern. I don't see youthful joy. I don't even see elected leadership. In what was a very ordinary and yet strange background in me, I was elected Class Captain three years out of four between 7 and 11 - it was counter-intutive and I wore it lightly on my sleeve - and the kind of respect I got at that time was never ever matched. In fact, quite the opposite, I had to learn to be the victim shortly afterwards. And I can only put this down to the fickleness of human nature. You win some. You lose most.
So, no, I don't see in her the glory of sunsets and lions and bluebells and rainbows. All I see is a hectoring over-inflated miserable so-and-so. As for middle aged men's criticism being the equivalent to chjld sex abuse, for god sake. She is a woman. There is nothing of obvious sexuality in her. She demands to be received as someone who is 75 and not even an average 75 year old but one who knows how Governments work. She doesn't. She can't possibly do,. No one does. I didn't at 16 or even 40 and by then I had had 18 years of experience working to Ministers including on environmental policy.
What I do see is that kind of bullying thing where clout is casually tossed by someone who is too large in any playground - and most playgrounds are supposedly adult - and will then on receiving any sort of criticism and especially a put down expect her supporters to slur her critics viciously. I think we can deal with brats in the main. They have always been with us and are becoming bigger in number as too many people who are older indulge them. The overall message? Yep. I think she is totally right but she's just not the one to deliver paradise for all. First, she needs to be helped to get the clouds out of her own gullet. I suggest a 10 year course on how to acquire exuberant loving radiance. Depending on how successful that is given it should be held purely in Stockholm, she can come back at 26 to rule the world, subject to referendum. The thing that really makes me sick is not her but the sort of people of my generation who are robbing her of a life through their influence. Far from being the big ogre, I probably care for her as a human being more than most in my attitudes.
As a footnote, I am actually rather protective of very gifted children. I think they are often vulnerable. I sense it. I love that violin girl who has just completed her first concerto. Much to everyone's ridicule, and I was prepared to withstand it. I loved Lena Zavaroni when she became a woman as she was an exceptional lovely person who was deeply troubled by her own early rise. Young artists are easier to support though than young politicos. They are not finger wagging. Lena's ice cap sadly melted as did Jackson's and Wilson's and Garland's and adults are fools if they can't see that the Grets is being used by them possibly to devastating effect. Not by her so-called opponents. That in truth is real borderline child abuse, however headstrong she may appear. Michael was outstanding throughout the 1970s after which he was sadly shite.
Michael Jackson - Rock With You........from what was the last outstanding album; it was with the help of Hull UK's Rod Temperton a beautiful, beautiful album : by Thriller he had through no fault of his own so sadly become very peculiar:
Mick Jackson - Rock With You (from Yorkshire, UK's Off The Wall) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5X-Mrc2l1d0
The Undertones - Teenage Kicks -: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjkHrdU8HCs - and where IS that NI icon?
Lena Zavaroni, at 18 - the great Neil Sedaka's Going Nowhere - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8sewohu2qI
(She was born 11 months after me and died 20 years ago this month and that's tragic : there have been no tributes whatsoever in the media so this is my small bit to address that : it's one of Sedaka's best : she did it proud in her own way : the child star business was not to my taste but I listened to her later interviews closely : I really loved her as a woman)