John Kelly
Wednesday 12th March 2008 2:08pm [Edited]
Sussex
370 posts
Quote: ajp29 @ March 12, 2008, 12:28 AM
So the joke is that the woman wants to know about where her food comes from but when shes finds out information like its name and birthday she is put off?
I thinks its too subtly written but acted out it should be fine. You don't need the last guy either.
If I have to explain it, I guess I've failed. But yes, as a food snob she wants to know its provenance, but is knocked back when confronted by the brutal reality that she'll actually be eating a baby sheep. The French always seem more realistic about these things.
And yes, it's written to be acted rather than read, so hopefully there will be things there which an actor can bring out.
[quote name="billwill" post="120647" date="March 12, 2008, 5:06 AM"]
Ah well, to the fanatical foodie, organic is always preferable to mere free-range. And wild salmon infinitely superior to farmed, as well as much more expensive. It's one of the many ways we keep the class system flourishing in England.
"Maybe but your dialogue does not make that clear, add:
WOMAN: Oh, no chicken then I MUST have organic...
WOMAN: Oh, no Salmon then I can't stand farmed salmon..."
Again, this may be a problem with reading this as a script. I hope the way an actor did it would make these fine distinctions clear.
But I accept I probably need to try to write more clearly sometimes. Audiences are so quick nowadays that if you tell them too much too soon they get bored, but obviously if this leads to obscurity you've gone too far.
Hard to tell for sure here, without seeing it performed. Then it should be crystal clear. If it works, it'll be down to the script. If it dies, I'll blame the actors.