British Comedy Guide

I read the news today oh boy! Page 1,848

Quote: Frankie Rage @ 14th October 2016, 12:37 PM

I think the point was, saying you have done nasty things (particularly in a private conversation) is not the same as it being proven you have done them.

If the police need to investigate then the tape is out there, if there has there been an offence, of course he should be charged with it.

Totally agree with this.*
I just wanted to add that I don't think this is the everyday kind of "locker room talk", his statements in it are a bit creepier than what I'm used to.
But the tape alone shouldn't get him into prison...not even end his campaign, the people accepted his behaviour until now, I don't see how the tape can possibly change his public image at this point.

*Sorry Frankie, I wanted to start my earlier post with the word 'locker room' so I used a quote from your post.

Quote: Frankie Rage @ 14th October 2016, 12:37 PM

I think the point was, saying you have done nasty things (particularly in a private conversation in a locker room or anywhere) is not the same as it being proven you have done them.

If the police need to investigate then the tape is out there, if there has there been an offence, of course he should be charged, and if women come forward with accusations of assault then the police should investigate.

Exactly.

The timing of these revelations couldn't be more suspect. Trump was atop Hillary in the polls and then all of a sudden tapes and accusations from a decade or more ago began to appear. It's clear that the media sat on them until using them to try to swing the election in a classic October Surprise, and it's reprehensible.

I'll stand by my assertion that men and women say crude, immoral and disgusting things in private when amongst friends. A few weeks ago my friend and I were driving through the neighborhood and saw a well-endowed woman jogging in short shorts and a tight top in the distance and we made the typical comments until we got closer and realized that the woman was actually a girl of about 15. We both grimaced and changed the subject quickly. Neither of us would ever whistle at or catcall a woman; it was just harmless "guy talk" which hurt or offended no one, but had tape been rolling and were I in the middle of a political campaign, my enemies could use it to smear me as a creepy pedophile.

I socialize with a large group of men and women of all ages and political persuasions. Feminists, liberals, ultra-conservatives, Bible thumpers, doctors, businessmen, teachers, rape victims, and everything else under the sun. Last weekend we all discussed Trump's tape and not one of us thought it was a big deal and we all admitted that we'd said similar things in private during our lives. It's not as if there isn't a sordid history of presidential hanky panky in the White House: Kennedy was shagging Marilyn Monroe before he died and everyone remembers Bill Clinton treating a 20-year-old female intern as his own personal humidor. Sick

One of the women brought up an interesting point by pointing out that almost every sexual encounter, especially the first one with a particular individual, begins on some rather shaky moral/legal ground. Kisses come out of nowhere, body parts are groped and there's rarely a formal verbal or written request for permission beforehand. It's all about reading body language, sensing the other person's mood and being ready to back off if the other person objects in even the slightest way. It's tricky business, that's for sure. I've never had a woman resist my rather timid and infrequent advances, but I have had women I secretly fancied tell me years later that they had always hoped that I would kiss them, but never did. I missed out on what would have been fantastic relationships with wonderful women because I was afraid of getting it wrong. Like I said, it's tricky business.

Now he says 'She would not be my first choice.' Who does he think he is? I'd guess the only reason he has a glamourous wife is because she's after his money. He's totally repulsive.

Quote: DaButt @ 14th October 2016, 2:35 PM

Exactly.

The timing of these revelations couldn't be more suspect. Trump was atop Hillary in the polls and then all of a sudden tapes and accusations from a decade or more ago began to appear. It's clear that the media sat on them until using them to try to swing the election in a classic October Surprise, and it's reprehensible.

Maybe if the Republican party had picked an actual grown up, and not an overgrown narcissistic toddler to run then there wouldn't have been as much shit to throw at him in an October Surprise. The man's a disgrace. As is banana faced Nigel Farage, who seems to become one the odious turd's biggest cheerleaders.

Hilary's not much better. In fact if I was American I'd be thoroughly depressed that these two clowns are the best their once great nation can come up with.

They come up with them because only the rich need apply

Quote: Ronald S @ 15th October 2016, 10:59 AM

They come up with them because only the rich need apply

Bernie Sanders ran a credible campaign against Hillary and was not in any way a rich man. He was actually one of our poorest senators. Republican Marco Rubio was also a major challenger and is worth even less than Sanders.

Who?

Quote: Ronald S @ 15th October 2016, 3:31 PM

Who?

Bernie Sanders, the man who won 43% of the Democratic Party vote.

It should also be noted that Donald Trump won fewer votes than his combined Republican competitors, but the media played their usual role as Democratic Party shills and made sure that none of them gained any traction, safe knowing that they had plenty of dirt locked away to sink Trump in October.

?? So it's 'here's a good conspiracy that could fit.....so it's true'
Male bovine excretia.

Quote: Ronald S @ 15th October 2016, 4:31 PM

?? So it's 'here's a good conspiracy that could fit.....so it's true'

It's quite true and Wikileaks have even confirmed it, much to Hillary's chagrin.

I worked at a newspaper for almost a decade, so I have firsthand knowledge that it's true.

Trump - secret son of Hitler.

So you are saying that the 'newspapers' have steered this with some pre-conceived plan right from the start!
Making sure no other suitable candidate would be able to oppose Hilary and they could use their shit-bomb when the time was right.
That would mean then that if H Clinton was way ahead in the polls and unbeatable, the revelations and tapes would be still sat on.

People shouldn't be too concerned if Trump wins

Yes he is an odious vile piece of garbage

But he will be a mere puppet in the White House

Just like Obama

Obama has done next to f**k all whilst in office - he just does what he's told by the powers that be

Quote: Ronald S @ 16th October 2016, 9:17 AM

So you are saying that the 'newspapers' have steered this with some pre-conceived plan right from the start!
Making sure no other suitable candidate would be able to oppose Hilary and they could use their shit-bomb when the time was right.
That would mean then that if H Clinton was way ahead in the polls and unbeatable, the revelations and tapes would be still sat on.

Yep!

In the U.S. The Winner of the Presidential Race will be Status Quo.

Share this page