An interesting concept related to PC language is the "Euphemism treadmill": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euphemism_treadmill#The_.22Euphemism_Treadmill.22
Basically connotations change over time and expressions get increasingly "sanitised". One example they give is "toilet": not wishing to think of what the word REALLY refers to, and all the association with bodily functions, images of the person squatting down and doing a shit, etc., it has been replaced with "bathroom", a more distanced euphemism. But this word too will become closely linked in our minds to bodily function etc. so another alternative will be found for "polite" conversation. "Toilet" itself is a euphemism. I thought it was interesting anyway. It's the same with PC language.
*
If one wants a shorthand for my "dialogue of the deaf" argument, I was saying that "deaf" has two meanings. One refers to an unwillingness to listen and the other, to a disabled person. "Dialogue of the deaf" uses the first meaning. People who take offence because they think it refers to deaf people are misunderstanding.
If they still have a problem, as I say, it's with the word "deaf" itself, for having two meanings in the first place. Now, interestingly enough, the "PC brigade" have decreed that the word "deaf" is inappropriate anyway, and that the term "hearing impaired" should be used.
It's like taking offence when I say "I'll put the TV on mute" because it suggests I am about to crush a person incapable of speech with the TV! Completely different meaning.
That's not to say that if people get offended by the term it shouldn't be changed - but again this is wholly "PC" territory, which TBH I have little sympathy with. IMO in this sort of situation people should just develop a thicker skin. It's CERTAINLY not bigotry being levelled at them.
When the reader misinterprets something as being offensive surely it's up to the reader to "get over it"? Certainly if they're in a significant minority. Surely this is what anti-PC sentiment boils down to.
If you google "dialogue of the deaf" the first hit is in a Guardian article, so IMO its lefty credentials are assured!
Quote: David Bussell @ March 2, 2008, 10:01 AMOh, so now we're hating on deaf people are we?!
No. As explained. One definition of "Deaf" from the dictionary: "Refusing to listen, heed, or be persuaded; unreasonable or unyielding: deaf to all advice."
It does not refer to deaf people!!
The irony is that we're having a dialogue-of-the-deaf about the term "dialogue of the deaf"!!
A "meta-dialogue-of-the-deaf", if you will.