British Comedy Guide

How to Get Ahead... Parts I & II

Got a new laptop and so have been having a tidy up of the old hard-drive and found these... well they made me smile...

How to Get Ahead in Comedy. Part I

INT. IN A BEDROOM SOMEWHERE - DAY

STEVEN
What's first then?

STEPHEN
First? First we need some names.

STEVEN
We appear to already have some.

STEPHEN
Do we?

STEVEN
Yes, just above what we're saying.

STEPHEN
Oh yeh. So I'm Stephen and your...?

STEVEN
Steven.

STEPHEN
Right... Next?

STEVEN
The set up.

STEPHEN
Set up?

STEVEN
Where we are. Who we are, that sort
of stuff. It sets the scene and
helps to "Set up" the gag.

STEPHEN
Then?

STEVEN
Then... then the body of the
sketch, some witty lines, a gag or
two, in character of course, all
leading to the - Ba-Dum-Ching!

STEPHEN
The punchline?

STEVEN
Correct.

STEPHEN
How long does it have to be?

STEVEN
Two, three minutes max.

STEPHEN
Three minutes. That's nearly ten
sketches a show... That's...
(He starts to count on his
fingers)
...sixty different ideas for a
series... Seems like a lot of hard
work to me. Can't we just create
some grotesques and a catch-phrase.

STEVEN
Original... I like it.
(Beat)
We're in a night club...

STEPHEN
I'm dressed as a geek. Sort of I.T.
meets Accounts. Bad hair, bad
teeth, bad breath...

STEVEN
I'm at the bar -

STEPHEN
Dressed as a middle-aged woman -

STEVEN
But get this, wearing the sort of
gear girls wear for a big night on
the town..

STEPHEN
Mini skirt..

STEVEN
Crop top...

STEVEN/STEPHEN(TOGETHER)
Two sizes to small... Genius...

STEVEN
I stagger over to you and say...

STEPHEN
...Can you see my minge?

STEVEN
Brilliant, our first catch-phrase.
Okay we just need six more versions
of that sketch.

STEPHEN
Half a dozen more characters...

STEVEN
Series written. Bang it in an
envelope. BBC3 here we come.

STEPHEN
Pub?

STEVEN
Pub.

END.

How to Get Ahead in Comedy. Part II

INT. BEDROOM - SOME WHERE IN ENGLAND - DAY

STEPHEN
Of course, Sit-Coms are where the
money is...

STEVEN
And the kudos.

STEPHEN
Well yes of course the kudos.

STEVEN
Cash and kudos.

STEPHEN
But we wouldn't be doing it for
those reasons.

STEVEN
Wouldn't we?

STEPHEN
No... we would be doing it as an
exercise in character development.
To see how far we could push the
envelope of a tired and jaded
format.

STEVEN
So you're saying we should throw
out the rule book.

STEPHEN
Yes.

STEVEN
Mess with the audiences
expectations.

STEPHEN
Yes.

STEVEN
Say to hell with the usual
conventions.

STEPHEN
Yes. We shall explode the myth of
the British Sit-Com.

STEVEN
Cult viewing on BBC3.

STEPHEN
BAFTA'S....

STEVEN
EMMY'S....

STEPHEN
The golden Rose of Montreux....

STEPHEN + STEVEN
(With awe)
The viewers choice....

STEPHEN
First of all we need a protagonist.
Some one the viewer will love to
hate. A character they will
recognise, but not as themselves.
Some one pompous, overbearing and
with a leaning to grandiose
ideas....

STEVEN
You mean like Basil Fawlty, Captain
Mainwaring, that Extra's bloke...

STEPHEN
Okay, so that's been done. How
about some one weak, ineffectual,
some one the audience can pity...

STEVEN
Sorry, Ever Decreasing Circles...

STEPHEN
No don't apologise....

STEVEN
No, Sorry, Ronnie Corbett...

STEPHEN
Oh, yes...

STEVEN
Look this all seems like rather
hard work... Can't we just go for
the cash.

STEPHEN
 White middle class family...

STEVEN
Dysfunctional dad...

STEPHEN
Ditsy mum...

STEVEN
Two teenage kids....

STEPHEN
Older girl, younger boy...

STEVEN
Set in an unidentified posh area of
North London...

STEPHEN
Slightly eccentric
neighbour/relative/work
colleague/friend*....

STEVEN
*Delete as applicable.

STEPHEN
Plots?

STEVEN
Dad, trouble at work...

STEPHEN
Mum, trouble at home...

STEVEN
Boyfriend problems...

STEPHEN
Girlfriend problems...

STEVEN
Some one important is coming to
stay...

STEPHEN
Power cut... Spooky slapstick.

STEVEN
Perfect.

STEPHEN
First series done.

STEVEN
Bang it in an envelope.

STEPHEN
Friday night eight-thirty BBC1,
here we come...

STEVEN
Pub?

STEPHEN
Pub.

END.

Sorry - read the first few lines and then lost interest.

Quote: David Chapman @ February 20, 2008, 12:53 AM

Sorry - read the first few lines and then lost interest.

Is it really in the tradition of friendly, co-operative, civilised writing communities for David (with almost 6000 posts) to walk up to a near-embryonic newbie, kick him hard in the face and then walk away as if nothing has happened?

I don't think it is, is it?

Good manners aside, on any scale of crap to brilliant, the above two sketches would rate above the halfway mark. I think most knowledgeable comedy writers would commend them on several bases.

There's are some long and dishonourable traditions on writing websites. 'Praising people you like no matter how bad they are' is one of them. 'Slagging off people you don't like no matter how good they are' is another. But the most dishonourable of all is surely the practice of attacking/ignoring obviously talented newbies because their presence threatens to upset the cradle of our own collective mediocrity.

Thought these were very good KJ. In particular the first one. Made me smile quite a lot. :D :D :D

Me too I liked it :D

Cheers everyone... even DC who was honest if rather terse.

They're not great meisterwerkes. I wrote them a while ago when I was feeling bitter about BBC comedy and when I found them last night they made me smile and I felt the need to share...

kjs

well, you can be harsh Oz LOL

Yes, they were rather tinged with bitterness! But yes, I'd agree they're above the halfway mark. I'd say it's evidence of a writer who genuinely writes as an outlet/form of expression. Here the mood was clearly one of frustration and I think it does show somewhat as it's quite clever/well-written but not as funny as other stuff you've posted.

I liked it KJ.

Nice clever, though will appeal to none writers. Actually probably will, it's funny, and ironic, could cover all the forms of comedy.

I did a sitcom pilot on a comedy writing group.

Quote: FoxyBox @ February 20, 2008, 7:40 AM

There's are some long and dishonourable traditions on writing websites. 'Praising people you like no matter how bad they are' is one of them. 'Slagging off people you don't like no matter how good they are' is another.

I don't know him to not like him. That is total bollocks and especially from someone who posts under different names.

I was being honest. I started reading it and felt it wasn't going anywhere so moved on.

Nothing personal KJ.

Quote: David Chapman @ February 20, 2008, 11:46 PM

I don't know him to not like him. That is total bollocks and especially from someone who posts under different names.

I was being honest. I started reading it and felt it wasn't going anywhere so moved on.

What he said. DC's crit read like someone wasn't engaged early enough by the piece, which seems like reasonable crit to me. It's either that or nothing.

For me, I quite liked these sketches but felt they would only be possible for an established comedy partnership. They don't come across as newcomer pieces.

Share this page