Quote: Harridan @ 14th December 2013, 10:23 PM GMTI don't understand why every single detail of this trial is being made public knowledge. I don't see how it's in the public interest to report so much on this trial - it's just gossip. Whether or not that stuff is true, it's now a part of Nigella Lawson's public profile and she won't be able to shake it off. The whole thing seems like an excuse to get as much dirt on Lawson and Saatchi and I'm amazed it's allowed.
I suppose in theory all and any trials are in the public interest, because none should be covered up unless very specific circumstances are in place.
The reverse is I suppose the super injuctions, where adulterous, perverts get protection. As their children shouldn't find out about their sexually degenerate, faithless ways.
And the press print what people want to read or atleast most of them.
So yes to big boobed, celeb chef stuffs dope in kids gobs.
No to Bayer demanding right to murder bees on mass.