Chris Langham Page 21

Quote: James Williams @ February 19, 2008, 1:23 AM

But I think your inherent assumption here that these people aren't innocent is a little worrying: "If the odd so called “Innocent” is pulled up in our fight against terror then well, so be it."
I mean, that's not right.

View original

I really don't think that that is what she meant at all.

Quote: James Williams @ February 19, 2008, 1:23 AM

Political correctness is a load of bollocks. It is a back-firing (but often well meaning) attempt by closed-minded people not to step on anyone's toes while remaining completely ignorant of various cultures. It's divisive rather than unifying.

View original

Indeed. It's one of the biggest evils we face at the moment, in my opinion. Political correctness's inherent lack of tolerance and understanding is very scary.

Society has a duty to protects it's members from their own community and themselves.

We are way to tolerant of genital mutilation, forced marriage, cousin marriage, and religious sub courts that subvert the law.

The final insult was the government giving family benefit to polygamous families as long as they marry abroad.

Politically correct fingers in the ear attitudes, leads to much abuse of all people.

A responsible society sets universal standards, and judges those who subvert them.

Quote: sootyj @ February 19, 2008, 1:54 AM

If we talk to the calmer members of their community, and deal with them in a dignified legal manner, we can silence and emasculate them.

In the end it's how the IRA was defeated.

View original

Got to disagree with you here. The IRA were a single organisation rallied around a single purpose; the unification of Northern Irelance and the Republic of Ireland. The Islamic terrorist issue is entirely different. There's no one single reason (or set thereof) behind what they do. There's no-one representative of the issues who can be talked to. And perhaps most disturbingly of all, their religious texts are worded such that they can be interpreted as being in support of almost any viewpoint which one may care to dream up. The only definitive solution is to ruthlessly and without exception eradicate every trace of the people, religion and culture from ever having existed. And that's not exactly a realistic idea, is it?

Quote: sootyj @ February 19, 2008, 10:15 AM

Why the Corgis, it's the ROyals, or it's Russian stylee?

View original

The Royals. (If you wish to go out and start shooting dogs however, be my guest.)

Quote: sootyj @ February 19, 2008, 10:34 AM

Society has a duty to protects it's members from their own community and themselves.

We are way to tolerant of genital mutilation, forced marriage, cousin marriage, and religious sub courts that subvert the law.

The final insult was the government giving family benefit to polygamous families as long as they marry abroad.

Politically correct fingers in the ear attitudes, leads to much abuse of all people.

A responsible society sets universal standards, and judges those who subvert them.

View original

I meant that all terrorist groups need an ocean of supporters, and funders to hide in. Get the supporters onside, and you drain the ocean.

If UK bought Afghan heroin and burnt it, made Morphine out of it, or gave it out on the NHS. The Afghan war would be over by Xmas.

In Israel they did this with the West Bank, not Gaza, one side fires rockets and suicide bombers. One arrests suicide bombers and rocket launchers, guess which one's which.

Islamic fundamentalists want us to judge, and fear Muslims who live amongst us, so they can say, hey they hate you we told you all along.

Have you read my magum opus, "Settle Down Basra£ it's in the critique section.

But if it works, don't judge it.

Quote: sootyj @ February 19, 2008, 10:42 AM

I meant that all terrorist groups need an ocean of supporters, and funders to hide in. Get the supporters onside, and you drain the ocean.

View original

I know what you meant. It just won't work in this instance.

Just re edit and resend it's what I do, some times up till the last minute.

Go for the Grenfell sketch it's original it's got legs. But it's a small niche story, so you'll have to play up the intro.

If you don't write it let me know, cos I will otherwise.

n.b. why not write Paul Burrell dies in sex, suicide mishap skit. That way if you get lucky, we all get lucky.

Podgy, spoon stealing, fake posh spouting, necrophiliac twunt.

I look forward to seeing it on the stage.

"We can't play ring a ring a roses, Abu Hamza always feels left out,"

Quote: sootyj @ February 19, 2008, 1:48 AM

Up until the early 20th century, people who failed at suicide could be hung for attempted murder.

View original

Its what they would have wanted

Not so sure, I mean it's quite a personal thing.

It would be like not being able to wipe your bottom, and having the teacher do it for you in front of the whole class.

Some people would pay lots of money for that kind of thing.

Is there no area of human experience that some one doesn't get a deviant thrill from.

There's even Japanese brothels that specialize, in men who like pinching bums on Tubes.

o_O

There's a nasty fetish over there where ladies with mega long pointy heels walk on animals and crush them to death. Even kitties.

Don't like it.

One woman who did that got tracked to Shanghai, and arrested, by enraged animal lovers.

Be careful what you post funsters!

I hope that they locked her in an iron maiden.