Here are my reviews. Reading all of these scripts really makes you think about your own work
2 dimwits in a lift. I didn't really buy that Malcolm was fine until Jamie mentioned it wasn't exciting. And lines like "how many more times" and "not this again" threw me because they've only been in the lift 40 seconds, unless they have preexisting relationship of course but there's no mention of it. I like the 3 quid bet joke. No real plot. NO
2 to 1. Loved the image of someone smoking and eating cheese - a bad breath triumph. I like the role reversal of the employee caring and the manager not, but it could be more apparent. There was a hint of a story - the shop being in trouble - but then it got lost. NO
ARTHOUSE. Not much difference between the characters, except the Bob Sharp character. They is a hint of a story at the beginning but it's not used to it's full potential and all seems a bit low stakes. I like the hugging joke. NO
BACKSTAGE - GUN. The problem s introduced very quickly which is good. But it's low stakes and solved very quickly. Decent characterization, but seems light on jokes. YES
BAXTER. Seems like a late night Jeremy Kyle so it's not really a premise for me. Also doesn't the baby have to be born for a DNA test? Other than the story of the guests, there is no story to keep it going. NO
BEING SOCIAL. Some characterization. I think the anal/rule obsessed character would be a good thing for the OCD character to be around, so maybe it would be better to put the OCD character in with a complete slob who would offset his traits rather than appease them with the safety of rules? There isn't really a story. NO
BELOW THE LINE. Story isn't introduced until quite late and even then it's not high risk. Even if she sees her ex is that a big deal? And if it is couldn't she just wear her monsters head and hide that way? Some decent jokes. NO
BOOKMOBILE. Good characterization. I feel the story is a new employee starting, but that would be a better story later in the series when the status quo has been set so the new employee threatens to upend their world just by showing up. As it is it's another character we don't know so it doesn't really work. Some decent jokes and characters. YES
BUCK KNIGHTLY. I like the idea of a lazy superhero. I thought the story was going to be Buck reluctantly saving the hostages but then it kind of disappeared. NO
CASSIE. Not much distinction between characters. I think you could have condensed the first 10 pages of exposition into a few lines in Cassies head like "how could she do this to me" which would have freed you up to explore a more action filled story. NO
CHODE charity. The layout was difficult to follow - doesn't effect my vote but worth noting. Jokes fall flat and some of Debbies lines seem to be meant for someone else. NO
CULT OF STAN. I think it would give you more scope for stories if you started at a point when the group was established that way you wouldn't have to do the introduction type lines and you could get the characters across by how they interact. As it stands the only story comes in act 2. NO
DAISY DAISY. There's a very high risk story introduced pretty quickly, can't get any higher risk than losing a child, but it kind of fades in and out. MAYBE
DEMEDDLERS. Good characters. Strange thing to say about a script that involves time travel, but they didn't have much story. MAYBE
DONNIE EPISODE 1. Not much difference between characters and no real story. Also the cliffhanger doesn't make me want to know what happens to Donnie. In fact I want him to get sacked. NO
CARAVAN SCRIPT. I thought it was going to be about the trials and tribulations of going green but that disappeared fairly quickly. Nice characters and decent jokes. MAYBE
FLICK OF THE WRIST. The characters all felt the same to me and the jokes fell flat. Especially the time dedicated to fart noises. NO
HENCH. I like the premise and there is some characterization. But I feel it would have been advantageous to have introduced the premise along side a story rather than just the premise. I do like Pip most out of all the characters. Ill give it a MAYBE
HMS Bagworth. Hard to tell the difference between characters. Jokes fall for flat for me. I did like the fact it took place in a submarine, but it was slow to get going. NO
HONEST. Rounded characters are introduced within first couple of lines which is great. The Michelle character is very rounded and annoying, in a good way. But there's not much of story. MAYBE
KATE AND MIKKA. There is a clear story but it feels a bit low risk. The jokes also fall flat. Because Kate and Mika are very similar it was hard to tell the difference and envisage conflict NO
LES HAPPY. There is a hint of characterization with Gemma, but it gets lost. Jokes fell flat. NO
ME, MYSELF & I. Lot of over expositional lines at the start. Jokes fell flat especially the reference to IT crowd (switch it on/off) NO
MEN AT SEA. I was reluctant to start reading it when I saw it said page 1 of 21! I liked the Christmas joke. Slow to get going. NO
MR EGO . Not much of a story and the jokes fell flat for me. Also thought the coach and lead were too similar NO
NOBODY & HIS CAT. Not much of a story. There's kind of a story when the wrong crowd show up but it's introduced too late. The jokes fell flat. NO
NOT BOOK SMART. Jokes a bit flat and a lot of just two people talking with nothing happening. Also the layout was hard to follow, which had no affect on my vote but just mentioning it NO
OLD BOY BAND. Alan, Jim and Steven all seem very similar. On the long side and not much of a story. NO
ON MESSAGE. Strong premise. Didn't really like that a character was called Freddy Kruger but that's personal taste and others will like it. YES
RED OR DEAD. Intriguing premise, but light on jokes. The story of the missing husband should be introduced sooner. I don't really like the place names for character names but others will. MAYBE
SHHUUUSH. The story, as I saw it was, Oscar wanting peace to finish reading his book but it was very low risk. Maybe if he was reading an important memo from head office or something, but as it stands I'm not rooting for him or anyone. NO
SINCE YOU'VE BEEN GONE. Nice premise, but the jokes and the story fell flat for me. I think we should see them living together from page one get straight into the conflict. NO
SMOOTH CRIMINALS. Slow to get going and jokes fell flat, specifically the gloves and porridge jokes NO
SOCKS - PUB. I like the idea of the cast of socks, but the jokes fell flat not much of a story either. NO
THE GREAT ESCAPE. Ed's first line is way too expositional. You could have just had the report of a convict reported on the radio or something. Slow to get going. NO
THE MAGIC MAN. This is my entry and of course I'm going with YES
THE SOCIAL COMMITTEE I really liked the first day dream, really made it stand out from the others. But after that they was no story and overly crude. I think the re-assembling should have happened before page 9. NO
THE HOLE. The characters are somewhat distinct. Some of Teddys lines are pretty misogynistic (saying all women want babies) and I think this type of character only works if Katy points out how wrong he is, but she doesn't so her silence kind of validates what he says. Also the jokes fall flat. It's a NO
TICKING OVER. The first page was different from anything else in the contest, so that's a positive. There is a story present, but feels low risk. I mean fixing a car behind someones back is fairly easy to do. MAYBE
TURBULENCE. Hard to tell the difference between characters. Would Roger sink to Jimmys level after such a short space of time. For instance if I met someone I wouldn't be mentioning his STI's within 30 seconds. The jokes fell flat NO
URGAN BOHEMIA. Loved the characters name, but the characters were very similar and I couldn't tell difference between Lilly and Xander. The jokes did not work for me. NO